A conditional connection is not reserved power — turordning still sits first

Reading order

Seat the 23 June 2025 method before any pilot slogan. Write whether the object is the feasibility report, a limited first agreement, the later Norrland-coast pilot, or only a press comparison — before you say the hall is connected.

Then keep turordning on its own row. The report says there is no separate queue and no priority. The first complete applicant is still first. If that party cannot be flexible, the next may be asked. Shopping a slogan through three inboxes does not create a conditional place.

Then keep the 2026–2030 need window, the two-year earlier-commissioning test and the no-reduced-tariff sentence on their own rows. Those are selection and price facts in the report. They are not a reserved megawatt.

Then keep named project rows as geography. Microsoft, Falun, Horndal, SWE04 Sollefteå and evroc Arlandastad stay operator papers. This register does not publish a signed conditional point for those cadastral units.

• The June 2025 paper is a limited first step, not a national product.
• Turordning still sits first. There is no conditional fast lane.
• Downward control is a condition, not reserved firm power.
• The February 2026 Norrland pilot is a later, separate paper.

What a conditional agreement and a pilot notice actually measure

The 23 June 2025 report measures a temporary allocation tool at transmission level. It measures conditions for injection and withdrawal in normal operation, and a later conversion to an ordinary agreement when reinforcement is done. It does not measure a named hall feeder.

Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943, as the report cites it, measures the order of tools: market-based first, then this temporary measure. Activation after trade closes is a control-room object. It is not a campus operating manual.

Selection measures queue place, flexibility, a 2026–2030 need and at least two years saved. A complicated meshed regional network can make the tool impossible because overload cannot be attributed to the connecting party. That is a method limit. It is not a hall refusal.

The 17 February 2026 Norrland-coast note measures a later pilot geography and a comparison with three to four Uppsala-sized cities. That comparison stays a comparison. It is not a reserved coastal hall megawatt.

What named primary sources show

Svenska kraftnät’s 23 June 2025 news remains the dated announcement of a limited first implementation. Report Svk 2024/5421, same date, remains the method paper for conditions, article 13, turordning, selection and the no-reduced-tariff sentence.

The 17 February 2026 Norrland-coast note remains a later geography paper already recorded in this register. The queue-etiquette page remains the neighbouring letterhead for indication and reserved place. Named operator rows remain geography.

No cited source here publishes a signed conditional point for a named hall, a reduced tariff or a reserved megawatt created by the word “pilot”.

A matrix instead of one curtailable-power slogan

Draw one page with object rows and evidence columns. The June 2025 method, a limited first agreement, the February 2026 pilot, a reserved queue place and a named campus town are different columns. Empty cells stay empty.

Do not invent a hall megawatt or a national curtailment week from the report.

Common misreads

The first misread is to treat the word “conditional” as reserved firm power. The report writes downward control in normal operation. The second is to treat the instrument as a separate fast lane. Turordning still sits first. The third is to collapse the June 2025 method into the February 2026 Norrland-coast comparison.

The fourth is to treat a named campus town as a signed point. The fifth is to treat the no-reduced-tariff sentence as a discount. The sixth is to invent a megawatt or a national week. The seventh is to collapse this page into the queue-etiquette page or the early-indication page.

What to ask next

Ask which dated paper anyone is quoting — the June 2025 report, a limited first agreement, the February 2026 pilot, or only a comparison sentence — and which connection point it names. Ask whether turordning was kept, and whether downward control is written as a condition.

Then open the queue-etiquette page, the early-indication page, the connection-duty page and the grid-connection hub. If the operator will not name the point and the date, record the gap. Do not fill it from a curtailable-power slide. This page is not legal advice.

1. Is the paper the June 2025 method, a signed agreement or only the February 2026 pilot?
2. Was turordning kept, or has a fast lane been invented?
3. Is downward control written as a condition — not as firm power?
4. Has a reduced tariff been claimed against the report’s opposite sentence?
5. Has a campus town been treated as a signed conditional point?

What this does and does not prove

This page proves that Svenska kraftnät already publishes conditional connection agreements as a temporary, turordning-bound allocation tool with downward-control conditions and no initial tariff cut — and that those facts are not a reserved hall megawatt.

It does not prove that a named Swedish hall holds a signed conditional point. It does not invent a megawatt for Horndal or Sollefteå. It does not treat the Norrland-coast comparison as a reservation.

Empty cells stay empty. Until a later primary source names the point, the conditions and the dated paper, the conditional-connection clock stays a method, not a census. DataCenterSweden records the method.